Does Hollywood make good movies?
The typical Hollywood movie has: Quick short cuts with a predictable and often
improbable story, superficial stereotype characters (either good or bad, etc), no obvious moral
message, nothing difficult, no sex, no controversy, little need to think, and no lasting
impression.
Opium (fast food) to the people
Hollywood
producers have so much money but still make a lot of films, which to me are nonsense, with or
without expensive special effects. Some films are so "light" they remind me of easily digested fast
food. And some stereotypes are almost racist (Frenchmen = funny & ridiculous, Germans = evil Nazis,
Russians = just drinking vodka, Arabs = evil fanatics, etc).
This typical Hollywood movie and dramaturgy is not evil as such. I also like brainless relaxing
entertainment and action. I love movies like Ben Hur, Star Wars, Terminator 2
and some, but not all, movies by Spielberg. They are masterpieces of their kind, great
storytelling. But there has to be all kinds. Of American directors, at least Woody Allen breaks the
pattern, but he is not in Hollywood either.
I think the typical Hollywood movie has become too dominant. I feel influenced by a superficial
culture pattern, that is very far from my culture. European cultures are simply not as
individualistic as the US culture. Hollywood movies often have a lone hero saving the world or
making a fortune for himself. But collective action for political change or against injustices
is
rarely seen. Indeed, our cultures are different. Let there be differences!
Propaganda
As a propaganda medium, modern movies are probably more efficient than Goebbels and Lenin ever
dreamt of. Now that Hollywood movies have reached a domination near to monopoly, I fear free speech
& democracy is at risk. I sympathise with the French, who want restrictions on Hollywood movies.
Of course the movie industry is a business and needs to make money. But it must be possible to
be artistic, to produce meaningful films as well. With state subsidies if necessary. I refuse to
believe that consumers worldwide want only meaningless entertainment. Given a chance, film can be
great art, rather than a product!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ab1/c4ab17821d8009a7890cbec1a2bb75f500d8ba1a" alt=""
Per Ĺkesson, 1996
Lukas
Moodysson
The Swedish film director said this in Los
Angeles Times, 18 April 2003: "Hollywood is the antithesis of my work. Hollywood is so much about propaganda, money and brain-dead entertainment, it rarely deals with art or real life."
Daniel
Cohn-Bendit
This gentleman is a German-French politician in the European Parliament. He wants the European
Union to do just like France, impose quotas on US movies. As a way to give European cultures a
chance to survive. He is not against American culture as such, he just feels that a mono-cultural
one-dimensional world will be a poorer world. (2002)
Bad movies get Oscars
In 2000 I went to see American Beauty, just having received 5
Oscars (not me, the film). I expected plain simple
entertainment, no qualities. I hardly got even that. Sure, there was some entertainment & funny
scenes. But mostly it was to me a mix of American neuroses & prejudices. The story seemed to me
superficial & improbable and I could not engage emotionally or intellectually. I live on a
different planet. Sorry!
Some personal favourites
- Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, 2004. The storytelling
is non-linear on parallel conscious levels.
- The Pianist (Roman Polanski, 2003, the art of survival)
- Russian Ark (Alexandr Soukorov, 2002, fantastic story, all filmed in
one shot which is world record)
- Amélie (Jean-Pierre Jeunet, 2001, this mix of fantasy and realism is
enchanting)
- Memento (USA. 2000) The story is told backwards!
- Battle Royale (Japan, 2000, unpleasant fantasy about schoolkids
who exterminate each other)
- Buena Vista Social Club (Wim Wenders 1999, fantastic music)
- Titanic (James Cameron 1997, "typical Hollywood" but the high realism & special
effects are hard to beat)
- The Odyssey (1997 TV production, closely following Homer's
book)
- Contact (1997, unexpected space travel based on great novel by Carl Sagan)
- Bean (1997, Rowan Atkinson as a painter)
- Forrest Gump (1994, IQ is not everything)
- Meeting Venus (István Szabó about us Europeans loving to hate each other, 1991)
- Delicatessen (1991, French cannibals)
- Cyrano de Bergerac (Gérard Dépardieu with a long nose, 1990)
- Himmel über Berlin / Wings of Desire (Wim Wenders with real angels, 1988)
- Idi i smotri (Elem Klimov 1985, German atrocities in
Byelorussia)
- Amadeus (Milos Forman 1984, fine music & filmed in original
settings)
- Diva (love story by Jean-Jacques Beineix, 1981)
- Blues Brothers (John Belushi 1980, good black music, good actors & car chases)
- Die Blechtrommel / The Tin Drum (after Günther Grass 1979, yes you can
refuse to grow up)
- The Groove Tube (Ken Shapiro 1974, provocative satire about TV shows)
- Cabaret (Liza Minelli 1972, based on good book by Christopher Isherwood)
- Yellow Submarine (Beatles 1968, love & music defeats evil, with
psychedelic graphics)
- Zorba the Greek (Anthony Quinn 1964, cultural clash & great music)
- The Third Man (Orson Welles, night scenes with artistic lighting, 1949)
- Les Enfants du Paradis / Children of Paradise (Marcel Carné, 1944)
- Münchhausen (Germany 1943, fine colour movie with actor Hans Albers and no Nazi
politics)
- Modern Times (Chaplin, 1936)
- Intolerance (W D Griffith, pacifist & humanist, 1916)
... plus most films by Pedro Almodovar, Federico Fellini, John Cleese/Monty Python, Marx
brothers, Jean Renoir, Stanley Kubrick, Peter Sellers, Krzysztof Kieslowski, Luc Besson, Zhang
Yimou, Mel Brooks, Tony Gatlif and Woody Allen.
Also some films by Lars von Trier, Ethan & Nathan Coen, Emir Kusturica, Ingemar Bergman and
Alfred Hitchcock.
Further reading
Constructive
comments? Send a mail. Beware that I am not a film professional. The
opinions on this page are purely personal.
revised
augusti 2013
Click on the nice little fish for main menu
|